Memories

I have a new woodcut print available in my Etsy shop! In the process of weeding through all of my old work, I’ve been revisiting old memories about each individual work.  Some pieces are a complete blur and I almost can’t remember even making them, whereas others stand out in an incredibly vivid manner. This woodcut, “Wandering” was definitely a landmark piece for me in terms of my creative process.  I did the print back in 2003, in my second year of graduate school. I had just started experimenting with woodcut, and this was the by far the largest (22″ x 36″) and most ambitious piece that I had attempted at that point. I remember so clearly that I had just gone to this tiny little shop in New York City called Tools for Working Wood to purchase these new Ashley Iles chisels that my graduate advisor, John Jacobsmeyer had recommended.  This place was one of those shops that could only exist in New York City, super specialized and focused in what they offered. The tools were expensive, but they completely revolutionized my experience with woodcut and this woodcut was the result of that. It was one of those perfect creative moments where everything carved like butter, I remember feeling so assertive and confident that I could stand behind every mark I put on the page. To this day, this is still one of my favorite woodcuts that I’ve done.

Thursday Spotlight: JooHee Yoon

Tell us about your background.
I have always been scribbling and making things. I ended up attending the Rhode Island School of Design majoring in illustration.
Name some people, artists, artistic genres, etc. that have been influential in your work.
I greatly enjoy European poster design and fashion illustration from the early 1900s. A big part of this is because I am fascinated by the printing processes, such as lithography, that were used to mass produce these images. I also like looking at medieval art for its bizarre depiction of space, people and animals. For specific artists, at the moment I admire the works of Max Beckman, George Grosz and Henri Rousseau.
Where and how do you get your ideas?
My ideas can come from all over the place. I constantly observe my surroundings, listen and read in order to fuel my imagination. As to how I get my ideas I am not completely sure. I constantly think about things and put everything down on paper.
What materials do you work with? Describe your technical processes.
I have been working with various printmaking techniques over the past couple of years. Currently I have been doing lots of linocuts and screen printing but my process is constantly changing, due partly to limitations in space and equipment. For my pieces I first make lots of very lose thumbnails and once I see something I like I start to organize the composition and sketch in details using tracing paper. Then I transfer the image on linoleum and carve and print by hand using a barren.
What do you find to be the most challenging part of being creative? What is the best part of being creative?
The most challenging part of being creative is coming up with an interesting idea. For me the concept is the most important aspect as it provides the foundation for everything else. Another challenge is creating work that not only fulfills the requirements of a given project but also satisfies myself. The best part of being creative is that I get to create whole worlds based on my imaginings.
What advice would you give to someone seeking advice about being an artist?
Don’t do it unless you are completely committed to your work and willing to go all out.
Want to be featured on Thursday Spotlight?  Get information on how to submit your work here.

Thursday Spotlight: Masha Ryskin

Tell us about your background.

I was born and raised in the Soviet Union, and was educated in the spirit of Socialist Realism. It was a very strict classical training in painting and drawing, which was to help in our required depictions of happy workers and our wonderful life in the Soviet Union as we were “building Communism”. Somehow, the “idyllic Soviet life” in general and happy workers in particular proved very elusive to me, and I constantly got into trouble for not painting the right thing. I have to admit, however, that this kind of schooling really taught me how to draw and paint from observation, and I’m pretty sure that my love of white and subtle shadows comes from years of drawing plaster casts. Then, after moving to this country, I studied printmaking at RISD and painting/mixed media/fibers/printmaking at University of Michigan. That is when I started to overcome my training and began to understand what it was that I really wanted to do.

Name some people, artists, artistic genres, etc. that have been influential in your work.

Somehow, the work of Marc Chagall is very dear to me. I still remember looking at reproductions of his paintings as a kid (his work was not really shown in museums), looking at his distorted chairs and thinking ”you can do that??” But it’s really everything, from Javanese shadow puppets to Japanese textiles to Rembrandt to contemporary artists to music to literature to everything else. I remember, for example, studying the importance of silence in traditional Japanese music, a concept that became very influential in my work.

Where and how do you get your ideas?

By looking at things and by making things. By noticing really small and seemingly unimportant details. A shadow that is barely noticeable but transforms the shape of an object, stains, fragments. A thread that can be confused with its shadow or a drawn line. I’m very interested in fragments making up an integrate whole. But it might also be something I read or a piece of music I listen to, or an idea I read about. Then, once I’m working, it’s easy to get new ideas.

What materials do you work with? Describe your technical processes.

I have worked with tea and coffee for a very long time. I still use them, coffee more than tea (though I question whether the instant stuff I use is really coffee – have you every smelled it in
concentrated form?). I like the idea of using materials that are not specifically “art materials” when I can get away with it. But if it’s something that needs to be archival, I use paint, waterbased crayons, graphite, mylar, intaglio processes on silk tissue paper. I use a lot of collage (bits of my own drawings, prints, digitally printed scans). I like working either very very small or very very large.

What do you find to be the most challenging part of being creative? What is the best part of being creative?

I don’t think you can chose to be creative or that it’s something you can turn on and off, just as I don’t think that being creative is necessarily a function of being an artist. You can be an artist and be the most uncreative person in the world, on the other hand, you can be of a profession that is not usually associated with creativity and be a very creative individual. I think that the best part of being creative is that life is never boring.

What advice would you give to someone seeking advice about being an artist?
It’s difficult to give a general advice without being cliché, every situation and every person is different. For me, continuing to work and believing in what I do has always been very important, as well as being generally engaged in the outside world. Showing my work is also something that keeps me energized, so constantly applying for various opportunities is definitely a very necessary evil.

Masha’s website  
Masha’s Blog
Masha’s Facebook Page

Want to be featured on Thursday Spotlight?  Get information on how to submit your work here.

Thursday Spotlight: Myles Dunigan

Tell us about your background.

I am predominately a printmaker, with an emphasis on intaglio techniques. I received my B.F.A. from the Rhode Island School of Design in 2010 in Printmaking, but also focused on traditional drawing while in school. I grew up in a rural part of central Massachusetts, and frequently refer back to the landscape of New England in my work.

Name some people, artists, artistic genres, etc. that have been influential in your work.

The most influential art movement for me is Romanticism. What I find most profound about Romantic works is that their creators allowed human experience to distort representational compositions, merging the intrinsic world of the individual’s subconscious with a shared language of perception. The Symbolist movement also fascinates me because it is the inverse: purely fantastical subject matter elucidated through a surprisingly traditional use of form and space. As far as specific artists are concerned, I would count Rodolphe Besdin, J.M.W. Turner, Rembrandt, John Martin, Walter Murch, and Hercules Seghers to be among my main influences.

Where and how do you get your ideas?

 My ideas are distilled from experiences that I have with places or objects that possess a profound, mysterious quality. These “sacred moments” are often dreamlike and possess a non-linear sort of narrative, much like something that is forgotten and then reconstituted through the fog of memory. Recently, the intersection between nature and “ruins” has been my primary focus, utilizing fetishistic architecture as a conceit for human experiences

What materials do you work with? Describe your technical processes.

 I prefer to work with simple materials capable of being worked extensively. I gravitate towards copper, wood, and paper because of their immediate physicality and interchangeability. I need my materials to have enough ebb and flow to reflect transitory concepts. My intaglio plates are worked extensively; images are “built” from disparate, preliminary drawings using a variety of traditional and experimental methods. All of my images are constructed in a piecemeal fashion with a variety of media with many layers of erasures and additions. The ultimate goal being a unification of disharmonious elements with the language of representational space.

What do you find to be the most challenging part of being creative? What is the best part of being creative?

 I would say the biggest creative challenge is applying ingenuity to one’s core artistic ideas. All artists employ systems as a means to generate work, but the work can easily become stagnant when an artist becomes too reliant on their system. Ergo, the biggest challenge for me is knowing when and how to change my “system” while still cohesively building off of previous work. The best part of being creative is when this systemic change clicks perfectly, and opens up a doorway to new work. It is that moment where you look at your process in a new light, and realize exactly where you want to go next.

What advice would you give to someone seeking advice about being an artist?

The only advice I would give in regards to being an artist is this: never stop producing. You have to remain constantly, incessantly working. No matter how “good” or “bad” the work may seem at the time, the only way to bring about change is through diligence. Just as a musician is expected to practice regardless of when their next performance is, so too should artists be constantly making work- despite not knowing if that work will ever see the gallery’s wall.

Myles’ website

Want to be featured on Thursday Spotlight?  Get information on how to submit your work here.

 

A question and a redo

I was talking to someone today, and I was asked that infamous question:  ”What is your art about?” It’s a question I’ve gotten many times before, but somehow it’s always a tough one to answer no matter how much practice I have answering it. The expectation most of the time is that your answer will be relatively short and succinct, and yet cover and sum up everything you do at the same time; not an easy feat to master. This was a one-on-one conversation which is generally less intimidating and easier.  The last time I got asked this question it was at a luncheon for new faculty where at the lunch table I was asked this question in front of all of these academics from different fields. So what was my answer today?  ”My work is about gesture in the human figure, exploring themes of social isolation and mental illness”.

Invisible I

The other idea that was floating in my mind today has been the possibility of “redoing” some past works from a body of work that I consider to be “finished”. I’ve never done this before, and I’m thinking now that it’s either a really great idea or a terrible one-there’s only one way to find out. As I was wrapping up “Wading”, towards the very end I started doing these monotypes which were layered and printed on interfacing and organza.  I was excited about the visual possibilities, but I think at the time I was losing patience with the project overall and didn’t give these monotypes the kind of attention and focus that was necessary. I had just finished the three 10′ x 4′ drawings for the Davis Museum exhibition, and I think at the time I was a little burned out from that experience.  Looking back on it, what I really was doing was just experimenting and playing around with the materials.  I wasn’t actually finishing anything or bringing the level of attention and focus that I generally strive for.  I’m thinking that now that I’ve gone through the experimentation process, it’s time for me to plan some new compositions and try to execute them with the kind of deliberate intent that was missing the first time through.

Invisible III

Drawing with fingers

I started the day off in the printshop, printing what I think are going to be my final three monotypes for a while. These monotypes were a good way for me to jumpstart this project, but I think that I’m ready to move on. Specifically, I have yet to digitize the film shoot I did and I need to sit down and figure out what I’m going to do with that footage. I’ve been working from photographs for these monotypes, and I think the film footage will provide new inspiration and ways of working.

Falling Monotype

Falling Monotype

I tried some larger drawing sketches today using printmaking ink on sanded sheets of Dura-Lar. My technique in these drawings was to draw and move the ink about entirely with my fingers; it felt primal and raw to work like that. I liked the stiffness of the printmaking ink, and it seemed to work well with the kinds of gestures and movements I was using to draw.  I’m also considering the possibility of layering figures on top of each other, as a potential way to show movement of a single figure.

Drawing Study

Drawing Study

Drawing Study

13 Monotypes

I worked on three monotypes this morning, making for a total of 13 monotypes so far. I’d like to pull a few more monotypes to finish this cycle of prints, but I think I’m due for a change of pace very soon. I have a very short attention span, and at times working on these quick monotypes makes me feel restless in a way that building a drawing does not. These monotypes only take me about 15-20 minutes, and frequently part of me feels “guilty” that I’m able to finish them so quickly.

Falling Study XI

Falling Study XII

Falling Study XIII

One Day

Since it’s Thanksgiving break, I had one full day in the printshop today, a rare occurence for this semester. I continued work on the 24″ x 18″ monotypes.  It was great to be able to work 5 prints today without any interruptions, instead of pulling just one or two here and there when I’m teaching. I was much less precious about each print because I knew I was going to make several today. Days like this don’t come around that often, so when they do, I savor the time and continuity.

Falling Study

Falling Study

Falling Study

Falling Study

Falling Study

Strategies

As I work on these monotypes, I’m trying to slightly change my strategy for each piece to get me closer to where I would like to eventually be. So far my strategy for these pieces is to use my reference photographs to articulate the figure, and then to attack that image with violent marks which cut up the image. Today I played around with giving the drawing another pass after the “attack” has been completed. This allowed me to go in and articulate areas that I lost in the process and bring out more details in the image. It’s always a tough balance to figure out what you want to clarify and what to leave ambiguous, it’s a balance that I think I’m constantly struggling in with all of my work.

Monotype

24″ x 18″, monotype

Back in the printshop

I’ve been really busy with teaching over the past few weeks, so I was excited to be able to squeeze in just a few hours this morning in the printshop. I’ve been trying to figure out a way to translate the experience of working with the lithographic rubbing ink on charcoal paper to a greater scale.

Gesture Drawing

lithographic rubbing ink on paper, 12″ x 9″

Today I experimented with monotype, trying to figure out another way to create these images. I ended up using a photographic reference in conjunction with the lithographic rubbing ink drawings as another visual resource. I started out staying very faithful to the photographs, thinking that perhaps that between the gesture of the figure and the darkness of working reductively with monotype that that would be enough. I kept a fast pace, spending about 20-30 minutes on each monotype to preserve the gestural qualities that I was looking for. As I worked the monotype, it quickly became clear how banal the drawing looked with that approach and that it needed much more to create the punch that I’m looking for in these images. It took me a few minutes to get over my fear, but when I did, I essentially went at the plate with some fierce marks, moving across the image of the figure with a cotton rag. Looking back at the images from today, I think I can push myself much more with these final marks on the figure.  The images also have a stark contrast to them that I think I might need to play with some more, it seems like I need to expand my range of greys to get more subtlety in the images.

Falling Study

monotype, 24″ x 18″

Falling Study

monotype, 24″ x 18″