Tag Archives: prints
Thursday Spotlight: Marc Cote
Tell us about your background.
I received a BFA in Illustration from the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, PA. I received an MFA with and emphasis in Printmaking from the University of Connecticut in Storrs. Since 1992, I have been a professor in the Art and Music Department at Framingham State University, serving as Chair of the Department from 2005-2012.
Name some people, artists, artistic genres, etc. that have been influential in your work.
I have been influenced by the German Expressionists (particularly Ernst Ludwig Kirchner), Edvard Munch, Anselm Kiefer, the Abstract Expressionists, Francisco de Goya, and Pablo Picasso.
Where and how do you get your ideas?
I get my ideas from looking at art, reading (particularly myths, fables, religious writings), personal experience and family stories, and travel. I keep sketchbooks in which small, quickly noted images, may become the building blocks of larger, more complex pieces.
What materials do you work with? Describe your technical process.
I work most often in color woodcut (multi-block, reduction, and jigsaw processes) using many different kinds of woods including cherry, pine, and plywood. I also do etchings, monotypes, and monotype/woodcut combinations. Occasionally I make handbound woodcut books.
What do you find to be the most challenging part of being creative? What is the best part of being creative?
I find the hardest part of being creative is that I also have to live my life in the real world and return to concrete solutions to day-to-day living. It would be wonderful if that part of my life was taken care of! The best part of being creative for me is having the liberty to take in what I see and imagine and manipulate that into images that intrigue me visually and intellectually, and hopefully do the same for others.
What advice would you give to someone seeking advice about being an artist?
Don’t neglect the financial aspect of life. Make sure that you have at least a minimum of a comfort level and stability so that you can consistently create work and be able to afford to pay for materials. The work does not necessarily have to be related to the arts, although given the choice, artists are usually happier if they can find work in the field even if it’s for a bit less money.
Marc’s website
Marc’s blog
Marc’s email: marccotestudio@gmail.com
Thursday Spotlight: Myles Dunigan
Tell us about your background.
I am predominately a printmaker, with an emphasis on intaglio techniques. I received my B.F.A. from the Rhode Island School of Design in 2010 in Printmaking, but also focused on traditional drawing while in school. I grew up in a rural part of central Massachusetts, and frequently refer back to the landscape of New England in my work.
Name some people, artists, artistic genres, etc. that have been influential in your work.
The most influential art movement for me is Romanticism. What I find most profound about Romantic works is that their creators allowed human experience to distort representational compositions, merging the intrinsic world of the individual’s subconscious with a shared language of perception. The Symbolist movement also fascinates me because it is the inverse: purely fantastical subject matter elucidated through a surprisingly traditional use of form and space. As far as specific artists are concerned, I would count Rodolphe Besdin, J.M.W. Turner, Rembrandt, John Martin, Walter Murch, and Hercules Seghers to be among my main influences.
Where and how do you get your ideas?
My ideas are distilled from experiences that I have with places or objects that possess a profound, mysterious quality. These “sacred moments” are often dreamlike and possess a non-linear sort of narrative, much like something that is forgotten and then reconstituted through the fog of memory. Recently, the intersection between nature and “ruins” has been my primary focus, utilizing fetishistic architecture as a conceit for human experiences
What materials do you work with? Describe your technical processes.
I prefer to work with simple materials capable of being worked extensively. I gravitate towards copper, wood, and paper because of their immediate physicality and interchangeability. I need my materials to have enough ebb and flow to reflect transitory concepts. My intaglio plates are worked extensively; images are “built” from disparate, preliminary drawings using a variety of traditional and experimental methods. All of my images are constructed in a piecemeal fashion with a variety of media with many layers of erasures and additions. The ultimate goal being a unification of disharmonious elements with the language of representational space.
What do you find to be the most challenging part of being creative? What is the best part of being creative?
I would say the biggest creative challenge is applying ingenuity to one’s core artistic ideas. All artists employ systems as a means to generate work, but the work can easily become stagnant when an artist becomes too reliant on their system. Ergo, the biggest challenge for me is knowing when and how to change my “system” while still cohesively building off of previous work. The best part of being creative is when this systemic change clicks perfectly, and opens up a doorway to new work. It is that moment where you look at your process in a new light, and realize exactly where you want to go next.
What advice would you give to someone seeking advice about being an artist?
The only advice I would give in regards to being an artist is this: never stop producing. You have to remain constantly, incessantly working. No matter how “good” or “bad” the work may seem at the time, the only way to bring about change is through diligence. Just as a musician is expected to practice regardless of when their next performance is, so too should artists be constantly making work- despite not knowing if that work will ever see the gallery’s wall.
Want to be featured on Thursday Spotlight? Get information on how to submit your work here.
13 Monotypes
I worked on three monotypes this morning, making for a total of 13 monotypes so far. I’d like to pull a few more monotypes to finish this cycle of prints, but I think I’m due for a change of pace very soon. I have a very short attention span, and at times working on these quick monotypes makes me feel restless in a way that building a drawing does not. These monotypes only take me about 15-20 minutes, and frequently part of me feels “guilty” that I’m able to finish them so quickly.
One Day
Since it’s Thanksgiving break, I had one full day in the printshop today, a rare occurence for this semester. I continued work on the 24″ x 18″ monotypes. It was great to be able to work 5 prints today without any interruptions, instead of pulling just one or two here and there when I’m teaching. I was much less precious about each print because I knew I was going to make several today. Days like this don’t come around that often, so when they do, I savor the time and continuity.
Strategies
As I work on these monotypes, I’m trying to slightly change my strategy for each piece to get me closer to where I would like to eventually be. So far my strategy for these pieces is to use my reference photographs to articulate the figure, and then to attack that image with violent marks which cut up the image. Today I played around with giving the drawing another pass after the “attack” has been completed. This allowed me to go in and articulate areas that I lost in the process and bring out more details in the image. It’s always a tough balance to figure out what you want to clarify and what to leave ambiguous, it’s a balance that I think I’m constantly struggling in with all of my work.
24″ x 18″, monotype
Back in the printshop
I’ve been really busy with teaching over the past few weeks, so I was excited to be able to squeeze in just a few hours this morning in the printshop. I’ve been trying to figure out a way to translate the experience of working with the lithographic rubbing ink on charcoal paper to a greater scale.
lithographic rubbing ink on paper, 12″ x 9″
Today I experimented with monotype, trying to figure out another way to create these images. I ended up using a photographic reference in conjunction with the lithographic rubbing ink drawings as another visual resource. I started out staying very faithful to the photographs, thinking that perhaps that between the gesture of the figure and the darkness of working reductively with monotype that that would be enough. I kept a fast pace, spending about 20-30 minutes on each monotype to preserve the gestural qualities that I was looking for. As I worked the monotype, it quickly became clear how banal the drawing looked with that approach and that it needed much more to create the punch that I’m looking for in these images. It took me a few minutes to get over my fear, but when I did, I essentially went at the plate with some fierce marks, moving across the image of the figure with a cotton rag. Looking back at the images from today, I think I can push myself much more with these final marks on the figure. The images also have a stark contrast to them that I think I might need to play with some more, it seems like I need to expand my range of greys to get more subtlety in the images.
monotype, 24″ x 18″
monotype, 24″ x 18″
Transition
With the print installation complete, I’m now in a transitional phase between projects. Most of the time I’m immersed in some large project, so to be between projects is a fairly rare event. I may do some preliminary drawing for my new project, “Falling”, but to me that project won’t really be able to begin until I do my film shoot which is scheduled for Sept. 13. I elected today to work on a small woodcut, just for fun and to see if I wanted to pursue the waders in another print medium.
I haven’t made any woodcuts for several years now, and it was nice and unusual to do something for myself, and not because I have a deadline or a big project. I knew when I was finished that it was just a temporary distraction, and that really I’m ready to move on from this topic.
At the same time, something was still bothering me about the first version of the print installation. I went back today and reassembled it, trying to keep in mind how to make more fluid transitions between the darkest figures. I also removed one of the figures which was noticeably smaller than all of the others, and for this reason was making the scale look odd.
Print Installation: Assembly Process
I printed my last two monotypes in the printshop this morning, completing the final round of monotypes. This allowed me to focus on assembling the installation in the afternoon.
I took apart the prints that I had assembled earlier in the week and started from scratch again, bearing in mind what I wanted to change this time around in terms of the composition. The large scale of the 46″ x 30″ monotypes made it tough to maintain a grasp of the entire composition, so I did a lot of stepping back to try to view the piece in its entirety. I’m still reserving judgment on this piece since I’ve been looking at it too much and have lost the ability to see the composition clearly. I’m leaving it alone for a few days and will come back and take another look then.
(above) The final composition. It’s nearly impossible to get a sense of the scale from this digital image.
(above) detail of the final composition
Trial Run for Print installation
I worked on three monotypes today, making for just two more to go to finish this series. As I worked in the studio today, I knew I was becoming impatient with my process as I started to feel repetitive and monotonous in my markmaking. To me all of this was a signal that it’s almost time to stop.
I’ve been eager to see these prints come together as a large scale installation, so I did a quick trial run by hanging the monotypes I have so far in the hallway.
Early on, I made the mistake of spacing the interfacing prints evenly across the wall, which made the composition more monotonous that I wanted. I didn’t realize this until I had already hung all of the organza prints over the interfacing prints, so that will be an important feature for me to correct the next time I hang the installation.
(above) The hallway wasn’t wide enough for me to be able to get enough distance to shoot an image of the whole thing all at once, so I stitched together four images in Photoshop. Granted, this composition was completely spontaneous and not thought through at all, but it gave me a much more concrete sense of where I’m going, and what the possibilities are. One thought I had was to make some smaller organza prints so that I could work some smaller figures to create more distance and depth. I suppose this is inevitable anytime you do a trial run, but I’m also seriously questioning whether the large scale of this is necessary, and whether this would work better as 4 separate prints. Part of me is really excited about the large scale, but the other part of me worries that I’m making it large just to make it large, and not because my project necessarily needs to be that way.




























